| 1 | import types |
|---|
| 2 | |
|---|
| 3 | # One of the nicest things about Python is that you can put pieces together. |
|---|
| 4 | # You only have to learn each piece once. |
|---|
| 5 | |
|---|
| 6 | 3 # an integer |
|---|
| 7 | 3, 4, 5 # a tuple of integers, also written (3, 4, 5) |
|---|
| 8 | x = 3, 4, 5 # assignment |
|---|
| 9 | |
|---|
| 10 | def f(): # a function |
|---|
| 11 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 12 | return x |
|---|
| 13 | |
|---|
| 14 | class Foo(object): # a class |
|---|
| 15 | def f(self): # ok, we had to add self |
|---|
| 16 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 17 | return x |
|---|
| 18 | |
|---|
| 19 | foo = Foo() |
|---|
| 20 | assert foo.f() == (3, 4, 5) # ok, sometimes you need the ()s |
|---|
| 21 | |
|---|
| 22 | |
|---|
| 23 | # Another nice thing is that you can just type things in, line-by-line. |
|---|
| 24 | |
|---|
| 25 | # So the question is, how do I do what I just did line-by-line (dynamically)? |
|---|
| 26 | |
|---|
| 27 | |
|---|
| 28 | class Foo(object): # a class |
|---|
| 29 | pass # ok, we need this so we can unindent. Any value would work too. |
|---|
| 30 | |
|---|
| 31 | def f(self): # same again, but it's not part of Foo yet |
|---|
| 32 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 33 | return x |
|---|
| 34 | |
|---|
| 35 | Foo.f = f # is it really that easy? |
|---|
| 36 | |
|---|
| 37 | foo = Foo() |
|---|
| 38 | assert foo.f() == (3, 4, 5) # yes! |
|---|
| 39 | |
|---|
| 40 | |
|---|
| 41 | # But what about this? |
|---|
| 42 | |
|---|
| 43 | Foo.g = f |
|---|
| 44 | |
|---|
| 45 | assert foo.g() == (3, 4, 5) # yes! And I didn't even change foo! |
|---|
| 46 | |
|---|
| 47 | |
|---|
| 48 | # There's no difference between bound and unbound method types: |
|---|
| 49 | |
|---|
| 50 | assert type(f) is types.FunctionType |
|---|
| 51 | assert type(Foo.f) is types.MethodType # (how did that happen?) |
|---|
| 52 | assert type(foo.f) is types.MethodType |
|---|
| 53 | assert type(Foo.g) is types.MethodType |
|---|
| 54 | assert type(foo.g) is types.MethodType |
|---|
| 55 | |
|---|
| 56 | |
|---|
| 57 | # Ok, but what about sticking a function on a particular instance? |
|---|
| 58 | |
|---|
| 59 | foo.h = f |
|---|
| 60 | |
|---|
| 61 | try: |
|---|
| 62 | foo.h() |
|---|
| 63 | except TypeError, e: |
|---|
| 64 | assert str(e) == 'f() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given)' |
|---|
| 65 | # oops, it has the wrong name too! |
|---|
| 66 | |
|---|
| 67 | |
|---|
| 68 | # So what went wrong? |
|---|
| 69 | |
|---|
| 70 | assert type(foo.f) == types.MethodType |
|---|
| 71 | assert type(foo.h) == types.FunctionType |
|---|
| 72 | |
|---|
| 73 | # Or in terms of what you'd see if you entered "type(foo.f)" at the console: |
|---|
| 74 | assert repr(type(foo.f)) == "<type 'instancemethod'>" # types.MethodType |
|---|
| 75 | assert repr(type(foo.h)) == "<type 'function'>" # types.FunctionType |
|---|
| 76 | |
|---|
| 77 | # foo.f is a method, but foo.h is still a function. |
|---|
| 78 | # Only methods get magically bound to foo when accessed as foo.name. |
|---|
| 79 | |
|---|
| 80 | # Except actually, foo.f isn't really a method. |
|---|
| 81 | assert repr(type(Foo.__dict__['f'])) == "<type 'function'>" # FunctionType |
|---|
| 82 | |
|---|
| 83 | # "a class attribute reference [which] would yield a user-defined function |
|---|
| 84 | # ... is transformed into an unbound user-defined method object whose |
|---|
| 85 | # im_class attribute is [the class]." |
|---|
| 86 | # -- http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html |
|---|
| 87 | |
|---|
| 88 | # i.e. f is still sitting there as a function in Foo.__dict__, |
|---|
| 89 | # but it gets converted to a method when accessed as Foo.f (unbound) |
|---|
| 90 | # or foo.f (bound to foo). |
|---|
| 91 | |
|---|
| 92 | # So how do we turn foo.h into a method? With any of these: |
|---|
| 93 | |
|---|
| 94 | foo.h = types.MethodType(f, foo) # Bind f to foo and assign to foo.h |
|---|
| 95 | foo.h = types.MethodType(f, foo, Foo) # Require a Foo instance for "self" |
|---|
| 96 | |
|---|
| 97 | foo.h = f.__get__(foo) # Bind f to foo and assign to foo.h |
|---|
| 98 | foo.h = f.__get__(foo, Foo) # Require a Foo instance for "self" |
|---|
| 99 | |
|---|
| 100 | |
|---|
| 101 | # Is that all it takes? |
|---|
| 102 | |
|---|
| 103 | assert repr(type(foo.h)) == "<type 'instancemethod'>" # types.MethodType |
|---|
| 104 | assert foo.h() == (3, 4, 5) # yes! |
|---|
| 105 | |
|---|
| 106 | assert foo.h.__name__ == 'f' |
|---|
| 107 | |
|---|
| 108 | # It still has the wrong name though... and you can't change a method's name. |
|---|
| 109 | |
|---|
| 110 | |
|---|
| 111 | # Ok, how do I get the function back? |
|---|
| 112 | |
|---|
| 113 | h = foo.h.im_func # im is short for instance method I presume |
|---|
| 114 | |
|---|
| 115 | assert h(foo) == (3, 4, 5) |
|---|
| 116 | |
|---|
| 117 | h.__name__ = 'h' # Better. Let's put it back to being a method... |
|---|
| 118 | |
|---|
| 119 | foo.h = h.__get__(foo) |
|---|
| 120 | assert foo.h.__name__ == 'h' |
|---|
| 121 | assert foo.f.__name__ == 'h' # Oops. (Exercise for the reader.) |
|---|
| 122 | |
|---|
| 123 | |
|---|
| 124 | # Does ".im_func" work on methods that didn't start off as functions? |
|---|
| 125 | |
|---|
| 126 | class Foo(object): # a class |
|---|
| 127 | def f(self): # ok, we had to add self |
|---|
| 128 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 129 | return x |
|---|
| 130 | |
|---|
| 131 | f = foo.f.im_func |
|---|
| 132 | |
|---|
| 133 | assert f(foo) == (3, 4, 5) # yes! Except... |
|---|
| 134 | |
|---|
| 135 | |
|---|
| 136 | # ... that was a trick question. |
|---|
| 137 | |
|---|
| 138 | # Let's watch the original definition of Foo again. |
|---|
| 139 | |
|---|
| 140 | class Foo(object): |
|---|
| 141 | def f(self): |
|---|
| 142 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 143 | return x |
|---|
| 144 | # Stop! |
|---|
| 145 | # What is f *right here*? A function or a method? Does it exist at all? |
|---|
| 146 | |
|---|
| 147 | |
|---|
| 148 | |
|---|
| 149 | |
|---|
| 150 | # Of course it does. It's a function. |
|---|
| 151 | assert type(f) == types.FunctionType |
|---|
| 152 | |
|---|
| 153 | |
|---|
| 154 | |
|---|
| 155 | # But *right here* ... |
|---|
| 156 | assert type(Foo.f) == types.MethodType # ... it's a method. Huh? |
|---|
| 157 | |
|---|
| 158 | |
|---|
| 159 | |
|---|
| 160 | # All methods start off as functions. |
|---|
| 161 | # (Except the ones implemented in C, such as built-ins and extensions.) |
|---|
| 162 | |
|---|
| 163 | |
|---|
| 164 | # Ok, this is what actually happens as we define class Foo. |
|---|
| 165 | |
|---|
| 166 | # class Foo(object): |
|---|
| 167 | # ... |
|---|
| 168 | |
|---|
| 169 | # "class Foo(object):" is delayed until its body has been processed... |
|---|
| 170 | |
|---|
| 171 | body = ''' |
|---|
| 172 | |
|---|
| 173 | def f(self): |
|---|
| 174 | x = 3, 4, 5 |
|---|
| 175 | return x |
|---|
| 176 | |
|---|
| 177 | ''' |
|---|
| 178 | |
|---|
| 179 | tempdict = {} |
|---|
| 180 | exec body in tempdict |
|---|
| 181 | |
|---|
| 182 | # Minor detail: classes have a __module__ attribute. |
|---|
| 183 | # sys.modules[SomeClass.__module__] is the module SomeClass was defined in. |
|---|
| 184 | |
|---|
| 185 | tempdict['__module__'] = __name__ |
|---|
| 186 | |
|---|
| 187 | |
|---|
| 188 | # At the end of the class body, create the class itself: |
|---|
| 189 | |
|---|
| 190 | Foo = type('Foo', (object,), tempdict) # "class Foo(object):" <= tempdict |
|---|
| 191 | foo = Foo() |
|---|
| 192 | assert foo.f() == (3, 4, 5) |
|---|
| 193 | |
|---|
| 194 | # The "type()" built-in doesn't just query the class of objects, |
|---|
| 195 | # it can make new classes! |
|---|
| 196 | |
|---|
| 197 | |
|---|
| 198 | |
|---|
| 199 | # Ok, here's a challenge. Is it possible to define a VanishingClass |
|---|
| 200 | # so that: |
|---|
| 201 | # x = VanishingClass() |
|---|
| 202 | # x is None |
|---|
| 203 | # ? |
|---|
| 204 | |
|---|
| 205 | |
|---|
| 206 | |
|---|
| 207 | class VanishingClass(object): |
|---|
| 208 | def __new__(newclass, *args, **kwargs): |
|---|
| 209 | return None |
|---|
| 210 | |
|---|
| 211 | x = VanishingClass() |
|---|
| 212 | assert x is None # yes! |
|---|
| 213 | |
|---|
| 214 | # "MyClass(1, 2, x=3)" means "MyClass.__new__(MyClass, 1, 2, x=3)". |
|---|
| 215 | # It's object.__new__ that calls __init__ when you create a class (I think). |
|---|
| 216 | |
|---|
| 217 | |
|---|
| 218 | |
|---|
| 219 | # Ok, another challenge. Is it possible to define a SingletonClass |
|---|
| 220 | # so that "SingletonClass() is SingletonClass()"? |
|---|
| 221 | |
|---|
| 222 | |
|---|
| 223 | |
|---|
| 224 | class SingletonClass(object): |
|---|
| 225 | def __new__(newclass, *args, **kwargs): |
|---|
| 226 | try: |
|---|
| 227 | return SingletonClass.instance |
|---|
| 228 | except AttributeError: |
|---|
| 229 | singleton = object.__new__(newclass, *args, **kwargs) |
|---|
| 230 | SingletonClass.instance = singleton |
|---|
| 231 | return singleton |
|---|
| 232 | |
|---|
| 233 | |
|---|
| 234 | assert SingletonClass() is SingletonClass() # yes! |
|---|
| 235 | |
|---|
| 236 | |
|---|
| 237 | |
|---|
| 238 | # And if we're being pedantic... |
|---|
| 239 | assert VanishingClass() is VanishingClass() # VanishingClass is a singleton! |
|---|
| 240 | # ... or a zerogleton. |
|---|
| 241 | |
|---|
| 242 | |
|---|
| 243 | # Ok, but is any of this *useful*? |
|---|
| 244 | |
|---|
| 245 | # Well, I've used SingletonClass for a DatabaseObject class, where |
|---|
| 246 | # DatabaseObject('Fred') would create or retrieve Fred's record. |
|---|
| 247 | |
|---|
| 248 | # I've even used VanishingClass in a type-checking hack: |
|---|
| 249 | |
|---|
| 250 | # /* |
|---|
| 251 | # * You are not expected to understand this. |
|---|
| 252 | # */ |
|---|
| 253 | class Integer(object): # a variant on VanishingClass |
|---|
| 254 | def __new__(newclass, *args, **kwargs): |
|---|
| 255 | if args and args[0] is newclass: |
|---|
| 256 | return None # Integer(Integer) => vanish! |
|---|
| 257 | # Just create it normally. (I may have this wrong...) |
|---|
| 258 | self = newclass.__bases__[0].__new__( |
|---|
| 259 | newclass.__bases__[0], *args, **kwargs) |
|---|
| 260 | self.__class__ = newclass |
|---|
| 261 | return self |
|---|
| 262 | |
|---|
| 263 | |
|---|
| 264 | def public_api_function(arg=Integer): |
|---|
| 265 | return implementation(arg=Integer(arg)) |
|---|
| 266 | |
|---|
| 267 | def implementation(arg=None): |
|---|
| 268 | pass # ... |
|---|
| 269 | |
|---|
| 270 | |
|---|
| 271 | |
|---|
| 272 | |
|---|
| 273 | # The main reason all this is worth describing is to explain Python classes, |
|---|
| 274 | # but also because it lets you create classes completely on-the-fly, or |
|---|
| 275 | # really friendly-looking declarative APIs: |
|---|
| 276 | |
|---|
| 277 | ''' |
|---|
| 278 | |
|---|
| 279 | class MyForm(object): |
|---|
| 280 | name = String() |
|---|
| 281 | age = Integer() |
|---|
| 282 | ... |
|---|
| 283 | |
|---|
| 284 | ''' |
|---|
| 285 | # If you need an order on fields, you're in trouble - remember tempdict? |
|---|
| 286 | # There's a clever hack though: give the field constructors a global counter. |
|---|
| 287 | |
|---|
| 288 | |
|---|
| 289 | # A final example: |
|---|
| 290 | |
|---|
| 291 | class Word(object): # a basic class that prints out as "Word()" |
|---|
| 292 | def __repr__(self): |
|---|
| 293 | return '%s()' % self.__class__.__name__ |
|---|
| 294 | |
|---|
| 295 | input = '''No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition!''' |
|---|
| 296 | |
|---|
| 297 | words = [] |
|---|
| 298 | for word in input.split(): |
|---|
| 299 | newclass = type(word, (Word,), {}) # create a new class |
|---|
| 300 | words.append(newclass()) # create an instance |
|---|
| 301 | globals()[word] = newclass # publish the class under its name |
|---|
| 302 | |
|---|
| 303 | assert repr(words)=='[No-one(), expects(), the(), Spanish(), Inquisition!()]' |
|---|
| 304 | # Yes, those are some very strange class names! |
|---|
| 305 | spanish = Spanish() |
|---|
| 306 | assert repr(spanish)=='Spanish()' |
|---|
| 307 | inquisition = globals()['Inquisition!']() |
|---|
| 308 | assert repr(inquisition)=='Inquisition!()' |
|---|